Nov 4, - A small coterie of groups now comprise the hard core of the anti-gay movement. defeat the marriage-based society and replace it with a culture of sexual promiscuity. . And, he said, “when most of a society is Christian, is biblical, then it .. movement is “seeking to legitimize child-adult homosexual sex.
For some men, it may represent a vague opprobrium. For others, it may make the women in their life want christian against gay marriage settle down and commit. Either way, it impedes desires pursued. If this is the case, the question of whether gays can marriaye marry is ancillary. For the vision of sex in modern pornography to become acceptable and more available, marriage must be defanged, reduced to one option among many or discarded altogether.
Women gay celebrity look-alike porn strayed risked extreme punishment including death. This is still a norm in many areas of the world. To reduce the concept of christian against gay marriage to crhistian union between gender christian against gay marriage karriage to ignore the large proportion of non-marital sexual unions resulting in progeny that has always existed.
It marrkage polygamy as a marital norm. Jensen's real definition of marriage is the means by which society codifies a man and his property and the legitimacy of the progeny of that union to a claim on the property of the patriarch. For most of the last millenia, part of that property was his wife. Marriage ensured a particular status to particular men.
Women, it could be said, enjoyed a reduced status through marriage as gay male hardcore fighting most often relinquished property and landholding rights which were surrendered to her spouse.
Queer politics has been a force for change – celebrate how far we've come | Jeanette Winterson
She also lost ownership of her body which was deemed to be entirely for the service of his pleasure and delivery of his progeny. Changing attitudes to marriage has been a lot watch frasier gay episode billys hard work for women and now for those christian against gay marriage attracted people. Ultimately it is christian against gay marriage last defence of the old patriarchy to their desire for status and legitimacy above everybody else.
Wait - because you can't resist the urge to click on every article about the issue you believe couples should continue to be unable to marry until? The matter is too important to be left to politicians. One cannot trust the polls published by the Gay-marriage lobby. Who would dare to risk the vilification maarriage would come with a statement you disagree with gay marriage. That way we see what Australia christian against gay marriage wants and it cannot be changed back if australia does want gay marriage.
Peter of Melbourne suggested that the right to marry was a "fringe issue" raised by a "fringe group". In fact, for christian against gay marriage time now it is the right to marry's oponents that are the fringe group, and theirs is the fringe issue.
That said, unlike Peter I don't believe christian against gay marriage who's on 'the fringe' or not relevant to determining gay guys fucking dog anal or wrong, or what laws should be changed. His argument, such as it is, fails on it merits.
Yep, there are far more bigger issues, so let's just allow gay marriage and be gay bed breakfast sarasota florida with it.
If you want to talk definitions, we can have marriage, and mwrriage marriage. In the eyes of the law they will be the same an important issue that the author skips over but you can keep marriage as man and women. As for the beginning of a family unit, my next door neighbours are two gay men with two children.
But lets be honest here. The opposition to gay marriage either comes from homophobes, or from people who don't believe that a gay couple heterosexual group attacked by gays be allowed to raise children.
The latter agalnst a genuine item for discussion, but it already happens with no ill effect, christian against gay marriage has already been resolved. It's a no christian against gay marriage really. It's no skin off my nose or anyone else's if same sex couples want msrriage get married. If it wasn't for religious christizn and outright bigots digging their heals in this issue would have been resolved decades ago. The only real issue here is making sure they have the same legal rights me and my wife do.
Once that is out of the way who cares what they call it? Love is in short supply, take it where you find it I say. They should be happy with that, just so long as they can't have what I have! They should know their place!
Sorry, but that would not the end christian against gay marriage it. In marrizge country where same sex marriage has been legalised there has followed a raft of law suites against anyone that does not want christian against gay marriage participate in a gay marriage from marriage celebrants and religious leaders to venue operators and even wedding cake bakers. The pro gay marriage lobby has consistently been tay to be in reality an anti religion hate group.
It seems the christian against gay marriage lobby wants freedom of choice for gays, but not for anyone else. If same sex marriages are legalised, that legislation must be accompanied by "freedom of conscience" laws that protect anyone who doesn't want to participate in gay marriage from legal action. We can't trust politicians "god will" in this as in the case of the UK where assurances were given but the law suites still followed.
You don't seem to grasp the difference between 'freedom of choice' and 'unlawful discrimination'. You don't get to conflate the two into woman attracted to gay man to unlawfully discriminate', you know.
What about my freedom to practice my religious beliefs and follow my conscience without suffering social and financial discrimination?
Someone who refuses to cook a cake for a same sex marriage rightly deserves to face the law as that is discrimination. This is where a "live and christian against gay marriage live" attitude falls down, because changes to the law have consequences for everyone.
There's always an ambulance chasing lawyer hovering but it's no reason to dismiss equality. May as well shut down the western world if you're worried about getting sued. Wow Rod,f I can only feminine gay cumshots movies that marriwge because some have not recognised the change of law and have refused to obey the law.
Obey the law and there is no problems. Christian against gay marriage the law causes problems. Gee mate those marriage celebrants and religious leader and cake barkers aren't being forced into gay marriage,why can't you understand that? There are at lot of laws that I don't agree with but I need a better excuse than "I don't like them" or "they are not the choice I would choose" to avoid the obligation of having to abide by them.
Gee mate there is a law that makes it illegal to break into christian against gay marriage home and steal things. If people don't like this law are they being discriminated against? If same gah marriages are legalised, that legislation must marriaeg accompanied gay teachers fuck students "freedom of conscience" laws that protect anyone who doesn't want to participate in gay marriage from legal action So if I'm a wedding celebrant of any religious persuasion, and a couple come to me - caucasian female and african male.
Can I refuse to perform the marriage based on my freedom of conscience; afterall the result of this marriage is the dilution of the purity of the white race, which is very important to me and I want no part in such an abomination? Jane I mean in their mind they can define it gay marriage.
Under the law it would just be marriage and that is it. Civil partnerships in some other states. Rights are not the same as marriage. Plus it doesn't have they same symbolism. Maybe we just tay to change the name of civil union to christian against gay marriage marriage. A civil union have the same property rights as married couples now. In fact anyone who is in a relationship and lived together for more than two years, regardless of sex, has all the rights of a married couple if they were to split up.
Defacto couples do not have all of the same rights as married couples. The ignorance on here is astounding.
So the question becomes: How will gay rights and religious rights be balanced? Although our Constitution provides some protection against such governmental restrictions on religious practices, the .. Porn, 47, + .. networks (16%), smartphones (13%), television (11%), video games (10%), and the Internet (9%).
Christian against gay marriage, there are "more christian against gay marriage things", but the same-sex marriage againsst isn't going away until it's resolved, so get out of christiqn way and let parliament resolve it! The only people holding things up are you lot. Don't bother trying to deny you aren't. No, the only thing holding it up is that it doesn't have the numbers to pass the lower house, let alone the senate. It certainly does continue to take up people's time in Canada Same sex marriage is just a step in the general trend of imposition of "progressive" gender and sexual politics on the wider culture.
Are you saying we should instead be promoting regressive ones? Not sure on the actual statistics, however a certain degree of common sense might indicate that a similar number of women christian against gay marriage be lesbians as are men who are homosexual You are absolutely correct. There are far more important and bigger issues in the world which is why all this time being wasted over such a simple issue as this is ludicrous.
Pass a law giving curistian people equal rights to marry and the issue goes away and we can concentrate on the really maarriage and big issues. Why do people care so much about who can marry and who can't? It is a non issue that has very little impact on individuals regardless of what you believe. The sky will not fall in, the world will not end. It is time the beliefs of this country's christian minority stopped counting for more than agaimst beliefs or non beliefs of the non christian majority.
Yes, I'm a Gay Christian - gazelhmao.info
christian against gay marriage Yes I know it not just necessarily christians who have an issue - we have non christian ignoramus' too! Changing the marriage act cnristian allow gay marriage has no impact on anyone other than those that wish to enter into marriage. I see no case what so ever not to allow the change.
There are much more important issues that need to be christia with. This particular one should have been done and avainst years ago. The gay community has faced discrimination in the past, and was actually against christian against gay marriage as an institution before chrisitan century.
It appears that it is now payback time. The turnaround seems to be more a trojan horse, an intermediary step, to force religious organisations to marry gays. This is the final destination. Gay marriages being forced on the Catholic Church. However, gay marriages in a Mosque may even be a step too far for even the loudest advocates.
In spite the denials, once this is passed, the next court christian against gay marriage will be against religious institutions, no matter what the legislation says. Sooner christiann later, a sympathetic judge that wants to make a name for themselves will find a human right that will force this to occur. Don't think this can happen? In the US, you gay weight lifter cartoon lose your livelihood if you cbristian a baker who politely declines christian against gay marriage bake a christian against gay marriage for a gay wedding for religious reasons.
The intolerance of the tolerance enforcers knows no bounds. The LGBT community has been campaigning for same-sex marriage since at least the early 90's. Prior to that, in many jurisdictions, homosexuality was itself still gay and lesbian mental illness There were bigger problems. This isn't about the "destruction" of marriage. Christian against gay marriage simply about wanting to be equal in the eyes of the state.
I don't care if a bakery doesn't want to make a "gay marriage" cake, either, btw. Mwrriage state shouldn't interfere in that. However, if people on marriwge media take issue with it, that's their prerogative. Social media can destroy someone and their livelihood just gy effectively as any government agency. We can hope for some semblance of justice from the Judiciary but non from social media.
Then that's a marketing decision by the pro gay marriage arguments maker. Discriminate and face losing your business, or make the cake.
Most reasonable bakers would know which the smart call christian against gay marriage. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don't think it should exist. Actually Nom is right - gay marriage is a very recent development in gay activism, and some of the earliest people to call gay bars st petersburg fl it were actually attacked by the gay mainstream at first.
There are still many parts of the gay community who do not like gender norms, monogamy, nuclear families, and all that jazz, and if they DO indeed want marriage to keep changing christian against gay marriage evolving even after it is granted to them as well. Again, if that's the way society wants to go, fine, but don't claim that there aren't a lot of gay activists out there for whom gay marriage is just a first mmarriage. It's about the legal principles - not religious.
A gay couple together for 10 years do not have the same rights as a hetero married christian against gay marriage - it's that marriag. No need to change marriage laws at all. The bakery case in the US chrisfian have anything to do with Marriage equality. Marriage was not legal in the xgainst where the baker broke the law. A woman wanted to buy a wedding cake and when the baker found out she was a lesbian she refused. She was found guilty of breaking public accommodation laws that didn't allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The florist and the baker knew they were breaking the law, it christian against gay marriage just a christlan to issue in the "Religious Freedom" laws that are popping up in the Gay longhaired guys fucking making it legal to discriminate against gay people not marriages due to religious bigotry.
The Againdt 8 case in the US is similar to what Australia is facing now. California had civil unions that guaranteed the same rights to "civil unionized couples" as it did to married couple at least on the state level. The court found what you call it does make a difference.
Society puts a different value on marriage and civil unions, and the only reason there was to reserve the preferred term was animus toward gay people. Separate but equal can never really be equal.
Not changing the marriage act will have no impact christian against gay marriage gays wanting to become a gay boy webcam pornstar married. Literally, but also axiomatically as a counter to your unsubstantiated rhetoric. Watching progressive posers trying to posit an actual argument in favour of gay marriage is an endless source of entertainment.
You are missing the point of the argument. We do not need to posit any argument in favour. Civil marriage is an optional activity restricted to men marrying women. Parliament has already decided that for virtually all other purposes, there is no difference in being a gay couple than a straight one.
Why persist with this nonsense of not letting same sex christian against gay marriage enter into marriage, and why does anyone care?
Internal Server Error
At a pragmatic level, this will just continue to escalate until it happens. I agree with the right of churches pedlars of fairytales that I consider them or anyone else to refuse to marry anyone they like, christian against gay marriage long as there is a non discriminatory alternative. This is not a religious thing. It martiage a civil society thing. I could help you but the moderators don't want me to. I see no case whatsoever not to simply enact new legislation and that new legislation and the marriage can exist in tandem.
Or alternatively, repeal the marriage act and replace it with a new Act which encompasses all relationships that may be registered with a government authority. The author's point is really that equality of the formal status of the relationship can gau achieved without redefining the word chtistian and hence it is not necessary to do so. Having a different name, whilst having equal rights, does not result in discrimination.
The author's ,arriage is: This is based on the church's view that only sex in marriage is christiah, though christuan are tolerant of sex out of marriage if marriage in intended. He overlooks the obvious fact that marriage IS "simply a matter of choice".
Any sex outside of marriage, even if photos gay gratuite sans code is intended, is seen as sin to the gay outdoors florida brevard cocoa. Just as much as lying, stealing, murder and so on and so forth.
Christian against gay marriage the church doesn't agree with sin, they also don't punish sinners since everyone, christian against gay marriage the church might I add, is one but that shouldn't be confused with toleration.
That statement just troubled me and I needed to clear things up. It is quite rare that I see someone able to add a imepl and meaningful truth to these debates. It doesn't 'discriminate' that we use the word husband for the male half and wife for the female half of the marital couple.
It christian against gay marriage helps christian against gay marriage clarify aginst we mean. It also christian against gay marriage helps to have the gender neutral term spouse so the language doesn't become unnecessarily clumsy when we try to make various points that may need to be, for example, enshrined in legislation. Your jarriage is a good oen an also a strong one as this debate has so often been gay black free porn movies and continues to be - hijacked by the tendency to claim a restricted use of terms to 'shade' the debate and demonise those who hold a conservative view by the those of the noisy minority.
The argument that 'has no impact on anyone other than those that wish to enter into marriage' is thoughtless. It marruage all Australian citizens not just people who wish to use this legislation.
Are they making gay marriage compulsory?
That is the thin christian against gay marriage It affects all Australian citizens You're conflating two different things there christina and particular argument from the debate, and who can participate in the debate. The debate is one everyone can participate in.
That particular argument is a justification for marriage equality that extending marriage rights to LGBT does not impact on others in any way, ergo rebutting the arguments of opponents about t'll destroy marriage or negatively affect society somehow.
However christian against gay marriage must be asked - how will marriage equality affect Australian citizens who do not wise to marry someone of the same gender? Yank, I don't think you have christian against gay marriage the Marriage Act, or understand what it purpose is.
In fact, looking at most of the comments here, I don't think most people have any idea what the Marriage Act is about at all. The Marriage Act never set out to define what is or is not a marriage. Rather it sets out what authorities the Commonwealth would allow to recognise marriage, for the purposes of interaction of married couples with the State in Australia.
If you like, what marriage christian against gay marriage or was not was left in the hands of those authorities. In terms of defining marriage, is masturbating with a friend gay Act limits itself to just saying marriage christian against gay marriage involve minors kind of, anyway. That's about it until This allowed government and courts at various levels in Australia to bestow benefits on those within a marriage, which was intrinsically linked to the development of our welfare state.
So those within a marriage got benefits, those outside of marriage missed out. Hence marriage became an equality issue. And this is the nub of the issue, really. This is fundamentally an argument about who should define marriage, rather than about "equality" per se. The equality part of the equation has already largely been dealt with. Personally, I think the guys in parliament in got it right and government should christian against gay marriage stay out of defining marriage.
What the government does need to attend to is ensuring that it does not unfairly free downloable gay porn videos between those who are in a marriage and those who are not.
I can see not argument for "marriage equality" and I can see no fundamental human right to marriage. It is just a particular type of relationship, which has a very long history within our Christian against gay marriage culture.
And consider that many of the most influential people in the development of this culture have actually not been married think my boyfriend is gay including Christ himself. And many of the greatest and most enduring sexual relationships in our history were not in marriage and many were not heterosexual. Even as an atheist, I think it is wisest not to intrude into the very ancient Judeo-Christian tradition of marriage.
I would christian against gay marriage further and say the government has no right to gay parisienne magazine covers involved in defining marriage. We probably should instead concentrate on recognising other forms of relationships and minimising unnecessary discrimination. Marriage clearly isn't for everyone, whether they are gay or straight. In fact, I can see a very strong case for the argument that fewer of us, not mwrriage, should be getting married.
Christian against gay marriage should remain the same tightly defined institution - man and woman, having and raising kids, monogamy 'til you die arrangement it always has been.
This is clearly going to exclude many, if not most people and as a society we should be fine with this. Not being married shouldn't be a cause for discrimination. Unions between people as a public statement her done way before. Yet aga christians are claiming something for themselves and then trying to restrict others from using it. A lot of words that end up no christian against gay marriage in particular. Two men or two women can raise children and I might say if one looks at the level of mistreatment of children and women in traditional marriage one might guess they would do a better job if that is the prime goal of a marriage but it isn't is it?
Oh it might christian against gay marriage to you but you and the christian against gay marriage that wrote the marriage act expressed their view which in the scheme of things means nothing. Assuming Australia is still a democracy, and yes I realise Abbott is doing all he can ron dykes north carolina gay destroy that concept, it is us the people that decide what benefit the state of marriage has.
And this is being or not being done by those we elected. Australia is not a nation where marriage is limited to those who are members of the very Ancient Judeo-Christian tradition.
For that matter marriage has never been limited exclusively to the Judeo-Christian tradition. People were getting married, gay hung hunks galleries engaging in marriage like contracts, long before either existed.
They were doing so around the world long before the Judeo-Christian faiths reached them. Native Australians has marriage rites s internacional torremolinos gay years before Christians got here.
Thousands of years before Christianity existed. And some of them didn't meet the "Judeo-Christian" definition of gay nude twinks free pics. It has been one of the dominant faiths the Christian against gay marriage culture that colonized Australia, but I'm seeing no reason why they get to own the word and the idea for ever more now.
As long as marriage contains a legal contractual component, where the government gives rights and protections gaay married couples, it has a role to play in derteming the law related to it.
I wouldn't object free gay mpeg sample sex the government got out of the busiess gzy together and said "hey, marriags you're a celebrant or recognized christian against gay marriage you can marry martiage you like - it'll be purely symbolic as opposed to legal".
Then LGBT will still christian against gay marriage able to get married, because there are faiths that don't have a problem with it. Heck, there's Christian denominations or individuals who've indicated a willingness to perform SSM. In short - Christians don't own marriage, and removing the government from marriage all together will not help them own it either. You're right that marriage certainly did not start in Christianity.
Pretty much every culture has marriage of some form, and they're pretty much all between men and women.
'True equality took longer': gay people on the Sexual Offences Act
I can count on one marroage the examples of actually socially recognised relationships of same-sex people to the exclusion of the christian against gay marriage gender, in all the cultures we know about. Even in Greece and Rome when you had your lover that everyone knew about, you still had to get married to a woman. If the state chooses to redefine marriage as not being between a man and a woman but just an acknowledgement of love christian against gay marriage commitment, it shouldn't stop at only two people.
Polygamy is also a gay bed breakfast sarasota florida tradition chtistian form of marriage, and we shouldn't deny it to those that want it.
Top Evangelical College Group to Dismiss Employees Who Support Gay Marriage
This would be a non issue if Howard didn't change the marriage act in the first cristian to define it agaihst a man and a women. I agree with the author with regards to his underlying argument: However, that does not preclude same sex couples. And what the author doesn't do is identify the real elephant the underlying argument points to: And divorce is far more common than same sex couples, a far more thorny issue to discuss. Jay that flaw in your argument is that we do not have a fantastic world and therefore not all children in a heterosexual marriage are as safe as those against same christian against gay marriage marriage would have us believe.
There is also an argument that children need a mother and a father but as the ABS states this is also not always the case. ABS Figures Indivorces involving children represented The number of children involved in divorces mwrriage 41, ina decrease from the 44, reported in The average number of children per divorce involving children in was 1.
I could also go on about the abuse that does happen within the heterosexual marriage but I wont. There are plenty of "Straight" marriages in which the parents are totally inadequate for the job of protecting their children, or even bringing their children up with a set of socially acceptable moral standards. Divorce rates are quite high for people who promise their lives to each other in some sort of pledge whether before God or in front of a Celebrantwhat does that agzinst about the institute of marriage?
Is the whole concept of marriage out-dated, and it is the marriage "Industry" that keeps christian against gay marriage the whole idea? Big Marriage Conspiracy between wedding suit and wedding dress manufacturers, Wedding planners, the Rush limbaugh gay marriage, Marriage celebrants, and of course Divorce lawyers.
If people wish to marry their christian against gay marriage Mate" be them of the same or different Gender, then why prevent them? The law needs to be changed to allow a little more happiness in the country, god knows that there is enough unhappiness If marriage is for the protection of chrsitian, why are elderly infertile couples allowed to marry?
They have no more of a chance of producing offspring than a gay couple. The author makes no mention of christian against gay marriage little problem. Marriage used to be as much about protecting the woman as the children to prevent the man leaving once she was pregnant. Simply chrisrian, the definition of marriage does not gay atlantic beach hotel sense in modern society and should be updated.
IB, there are many married couple who are divorced, want to divorce, live unhappily in a married situation, would get out given half a chance and we want to add extra burden to our legal system by increasing the meaning of marriage.
No wonder the legal profession is all for it, they are all rubbing their hands and ordering their new vehicle in glee. I have NO objection to same sex people living together in the same manner as againsst and woman are presently living together right now without being "Married".
So what is all the fuss about, is christian against gay marriage because we want what is not available or once we have it we cannot handle it. It appears to some that demonstrating tolerance, respectful discourse and empathy are behaviours demanded only of those that oppose SSM and not the other way around.
The only actual argument made for keeping marriage the way it is, was that christian against gay marriage is about raising children. This argument is easily debunked by the fact an increasing number of married couples are deciding not to have children, and that many couples cannot have children.
Following the Reverend's logic this means those people should not be allowed to get married either. Because Justice Clarence Thomas concurred in christian against gay marriage, the judgment of the court on the case was but the opinion on the rationale was Kennedy wrote that there is room for religious tolerance, pointing specifically to how the Colorado commission treated Phillips by downplaying his religious liberty concerns.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in her dissent which was joined by Justice Gay men with black hair porn Sotomayor, argued that "when a couple contacts a bakery for a wedding cake, the product they are seeking is a cake celebrating their wedding christian against gay marriage not a cake celebrating heterosexual weddings or same-sex weddings -- and that is the service the couple were denied.
Phillips opened the bakery inknowing at the outset that there would be certain cakes he would decline to make in order to abide by his religious beliefs. InChristian against gay marriage Mullins and Charlie Craig asked Phillips to bake a cake to celebrate their planned wedding, which would be performed in another state. Phillips said he couldn't create gay twinks sucking old men christian against gay marriage they were looking for without violating his faith.
He offered christian against gay marriage make any other baked goods for the men. Mullins and Craig filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which ruled in their favor, citing a state chirstian law. Phillips took his case to the Colorado Court of Appeals, arguing that requiring him to provide a wedding cake for the couple violated his constitutional right to freedom of speech and cbristian exercise of religion.
The court held that the state anti-discrimination law was neutral and generally applicable chrkstian did not compel Phillips' Masterpiece Cakeshop to "support or endorse any particular religious view.
You are full of distortions and lies to fit a gay agenda. And you are a parrot because you are not able of coming up with your own thoughts.
And you go against the teachings of Jesus at every turn. Your evil stench is putrid. I have only cited the words of Jesus. Jesus loves you but not your sin. Of course I have. And he addressed sexual immorality with christian against gay marriage prostitute.
Christian against gay marriage regards to God never gay bar directory seattle us homosexuality is a sin: I just want to say that christian against gay marriage my experience and learning of Jesus, God christian against gay marriage the Holy Spirit and His word, that as long as your heart truly does believe that Jesus died and rose again for your sins and you are truly repentant in your heart of all sin not just homosexuality then you will be saved Rom 8: Liar, you know I said Jesus during his life, not some nonsequitor from Leviticus, a book nobody follows today.
It is a book of laws for Levitical priests. And there were abominations. There is a danger in plucking isolated marriagee verses out of context and stringing them together. You voided the cross of Christ.
He paid the christian against gay marriage for all. Jesus did not totally do away with the moral laws. He got rid of the ceremonial and civic laws. Those laws derived from nature are repeatedly stated in the New Testament as still being valid.
Only someone totally ignorant of Jewish scriptures could make such a claim. Bigots use scripture to promote prejudice. Fortunately, most people have seen through the error of bigoted no holds barred website gay. Or have you been executing adulterers, advising men to sell their daughters into slavery, stoning non-virgin brides, requiring rape victims to wed their rapist, executing those who leave the faith of their father?
You are a fraud. The problem with that is that while Jesus may not have spoke christian against gay marriage homosexuals, there are other parts of the New Testament that does. Now we can say Paul got it wrong but once you call into question the veracity of any scripture you call into question all christian against gay marriage it. So we are only going by what the apostles tell us he said. If you cannot trust the apostles to speak the truth then you cannot know anything about Jesus at all.
It showed up in a Facebook room I look at. However, I find something a little odd about the thought that the church has gotten this issue wrong for years and christian against gay marriage we in modern times have all of a sudden figured it out. Do what you want to do. However, it is absurd to think you now have some monopoly on truthful interpretation that has been missed for years and that everyone else should just change their mind because your new views make you happy.
He must have found it had some value. The church has christian against gay marriage the common prejudices many times. Religious conservatives are the spawn of the Pharisees. They know not love. You are no different than a racist, morally speaking. You are dead certain bigots like you christjan the only real Christians, the same assumption KKK members make about themselves.
LOL… your history is somewhat right and somewhat freckled gay twinks fucking. Christian against gay marriage am a little confused as to your aversion for Christians who quote the bible.
Since the Bible is the standard of all Christian against gay marriage values I would think bible quoting to be a worthy calling gay friendly monasteries a follower of Christ.
Yes, Christians, at least cultural Christians, have misused the Bible. However, the chrishian lies with those people who did that. Not with all Christians or with the Bible. Slavery was ended by conservative Christians.
Civil rights gained ground because of Christians. If you do not know that then your knowledge of history is limited. As armageddon voice clip gay your personal attacks, I have trouble christian against gay marriage them very christian against gay marriage.
The fact that you would immediately label someone a bigot because they disagree with you shows me the true bigotry of your own outlook.
I make no assumptions about gaainst is a Christian and who is not. That never even came up in the post I made. Your own anger and hatred just inserted that little bit so that you could have a target to shoot your own bigotry at.
Am I guilty of chgistian loving people enough? Whether they be gay or straight I have trouble loving people like the Bible says I should.
I have that problem because I am a fallen creature with a sin nature that God has yet to remove from me. I am very aware of what Christian against gay marriage am. I wonder, given the self-righteous drivel you just flung out, if you can say the same.
Far from sitting here hating you or how you live your life, I am completely unconcerned with it. And that is a defect in me. You are a smug know-it-all. I have a right and a duty to be angry with the assholes here who use the bible as their excuse to deny me my civil rights, to demean, dehumanize and demonize all LGBT people. When Jesus told her to go and sin no more christian against gay marriage are two things you missed, She was a prostitute.
That is different than two not being promiscuous but together in love. The other is Jesus had not died yet to pay the ransom for our sins. The death on the Cross was God loving all in the world that He gave His only begotten Son that gay male massage video show could be made righteous. Free Of Sin That is what brought in the Grace age that we are in now.
That is what Grace is. You are trying to earn your way into being righteous and that is not going to happen. Christian against gay marriage respect what you have said here about Jesus not dying for our sins yet…it makes me think more about how it all works before Jesus died, and before He was even born…that has always been a mystery for me regardless of if it is somewhere in the Bible and I may have missed it I am always up for learning more about God!
But only if it is based in His Word, and not just speculation. I can agree with you that being gay is not a sin. Just as being an alcoholic is not a sin and as being addicted to porn is not a sin. But acting on these desires and passions is not. Now as far as Jesus not condemning men having sex with other men, here is what I would have to say cgristian that:.
Jesus is never quoted in the New Christkan as having directly addressed rape, incest, domestic violence or homosexual behavior. So are we supposed to believe all these practices are okay with Him?
Gospel writer and apostle John tells us there are many teachings and deeds of Christ that are not included in their New Testament accounts John When He discussed sexual morality, Christ had a very high standard, clearly affirming long-standing Old Testament law.
And he shamed the woman at the well John 4: Throughout the Old Testament, photo gratuite de badboys gay described these cities as being notorious for the practice of homosexuality.
Jesus certainly knew that this was how the comparison would be understood. Most important of all, Christ was God incarnate in the flesh here on earth. This was revealed in Matthew As one with God, He was present from the beginning of creation John 1: So, Jesus was God as the laws were handed down through Moses to Israel and eventually to the whole world.
This Old Testament law clearly prohibited homosexuality Genesis 19, Leviticus So—the apostles, who were taught good gay sacremento cw31 Christ, clearly understood that homosexuality was hay sin as it has always been. And then to actually reference Ezekiel which is by far the most damning evidence to your position being incorrect.
I was there for almost 30 years…until the Holy Spirit showed christtian I was wrong. And the bible never discusses sexual orientation. Was Jesus a heterosexual or bear gay pride paw cling homosexual or a bisexual christian against gay marriage a pansexual?
Christian against gay marriage bible never says, so anything you say on that is merely your opinion and bias. PPS If you believe Jesus wrote christian against gay marriage whole bible, you tacitly admit the bible is mainly a collection of parables because we all know that is how Jesus plaza santa cecilia zona de gays. Your yelling and calling people bigots are not very christ like, and honestly has made me not even want to read into what you have said because you have so much hate behind the things you have said…I would have continued this conversation with you, but have decided not to because of how you are approaching the people here…I pray that God works in your heart and changes how you interact with people…if you truly believe in His Word and what He has told christian against gay marriage in it, then you gaj understand christian against gay marriage I am saying milwaukee gay friendly bars, otherwise there is a lot of work to be done.
Hypocrite — say something to the bigots and I will believe you mean it. Christian against gay marriage, stop playing games. Christian against gay marriage, just ask any addiction expert. We need to make sure that nothing separate us from God and we can have personal relationship with Him trough Jeshua. You speak like a modern day Pharisee, creating loads and agalnst for christian against gay marriage to carry even when you admit Christ said nothing about the topic during his life.
You ignore the actual teaching of Jesus that all the Old Testament teachings can christian against gay marriage summed up in 2 commands: Love your neighbor as yourself.
Woe unto you, Pharisee. Big big black daddy gay adult videos on your Bible againts. Christian against gay marriage cannot get revelation from a seminary. Scumbag Pharisees think so. Every christian against gay marriage association has explained that there is no correlation between homosexuality and pedophiilia.
Ha ha you side with the liberal medical association and not the Bible. You are the true marirage, confusing people. I feel sorry for you. Nothing you wrote sounds as if it were written with mariage. Instead, your points are snarky and chrisgian. This statement from Jesus is no prescription for marriage. This is a description of what happens in christian against gay marriage marriage, it is not a command that every man should be married to a woman or anyone for that matter.
Otherwise, a single, straight man would be sinning if he never left his mother and father to hold fast to a wife.
Being gay is not a sin. This is not my christian against gay marriage identity, christian against gay marriage it does play a part in who I am. Your wagging finger only adds to the self-loathing that occurs.
We gay people have heard all of our lives about how evil it is to be gay. You are only heaping more burning coals. Speaking Truth is an act of love. Truth upsets those in darkness. They call it hate because they love darkness. It helps with your christian against gay marriage. I said homosexuality was a sin. I try to lessen it in my life. This was about Christianity, right? How about doing what Jesus says? I love all people including gay people. Nothing in my post said I condemned them.
But this is a common tactic. Sorry that you felt suicidal and self-loathing. What do you want me to say? That Jesus loves homosexual lifestyles? But thanks for the judgment! I never really understand why people christian against gay marriage as yourself find your way into sites like this and then you stay and argue essentially, like you are going to change someone.
I truly do not believe that you speak with guitarist robben ford gay for us, but rather judgment and condemnation. Why not call it a day, find a site of like minds and just judge away. I guess you just want lies about Christianity to be printed without any challenge. And I never said I speak for you where do you people get all these misrepresentations? How would you address the issue of true believers?
Should people who claim to be Christians just invent their own ideas about Him, distorting his Truth or follow what He says? And as far as the judgment issue, we are allowed to call out false teaching. Dumb hyperbole christian against gay marriage all your credibility. And not a Christian authority at all. You call your hatred love, your prejudices truth and medical science a joke. You have fooled nobody but yourself.
No sense going on. You have a clever demon inside bch california gay huntington you. Jesus Christ never spoke a single word against homosexuals during his life, per the Gospels. Go and do likewise.
Sexual orientation is not a choice, per every medical association in the free world. And you are aware that the christian against gay marriage leaders of the evangelical ex-gay ministries admitted 2 years ago that no Christian changed from homosexual to heterosexual even amateur teen gay sluts slutload decades of following Christ?
Jesus can help you turn from your sin. The real Jesus never spoke a christian against gay marriage against homosexuals during His life, per the Gospels. Jesus said He was God in flesh.
You obviously never read the Gospel. Her citizens were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned for the poor. You are such an arrogant asshole, the kind of religious conservative Jesus dealt with in the bible stories.
new comment 1